Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the political alignment and actions of the Democratic Party in relation to environmental policies. The tone is critical and accusatory, questioning the integrity of the Democratic Party's commitment to a green agenda by suggesting they are influenced by the fossil fuel industry and military interests.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a critical tone that could be seen as provocative.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of a political group.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory and critical. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive dialogue or solutions, and it could be seen as a personal attack on the Democratic Party. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its accusatory nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.