The statement addresses a public policy issue regarding the mandatory electronic tagging of livestock, which impacts both large corporate producers and small to mid-sized farmers and ranchers. The tone is assertive and the intent is to oppose the legislation and mobilize public action against it.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It focuses on policy critique rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, avoiding cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy for small and mid-sized farmers and ranchers by highlighting the potential negative impact on them. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on policy critique and expresses a clear stance against the legislation. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to advocate for what they believe is the betterment of society, particularly for small and mid-sized farmers and ranchers. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public policy issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.