In reply to:
Long Island Marine
@MarineSalvage1
·
526d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
526d
The statement and the preceding conversation involve a series of comments on a public figure's reaction during a media event, which can be considered public discourse as it engages with public issues and debates. The tone of the statement is hyperbolic and somewhat aggressive, contributing to a potentially hostile environment.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses violent imagery ('head exploding') which can be harmful and inflammatory. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others and can be seen as contributing to a hostile environment, potentially bordering on harassment. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses hyperbolic language rather than reasoned argument. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.