Joe Biden

Rank 1 of 47
|
Score 239
7/20/2024, 12:39:08 AM
X
In reply to:
Joe Biden
@JoeBiden
·
468d
He praised Hannibal Lecter.

Donald, Hannibal Lecter is not real. And he is a cannibal.
Joe Biden
@JoeBiden
·
468d
He said he wants to throw immigrants into mass detention camps as part of his Project 2025 agenda.

It’s despicable. Project 2025 is extreme and dangerous. And it’s not who we are as a nation.
Joe Biden
@JoeBiden
·
468d
He said he’ll “start paying off debt and start lowering taxes even further.”

That’s a joke.

Trump exploded the deficit in his first term and his tax cut plan will make it even worse in a second term.
Joe Biden
@JoeBiden
·
468d
He said he’ll end the “electric vehicle mandate” on day one.

Donald, there is no electric car mandate.

And American manufacturing is booming under my administration.
Joe Biden
@JoeBiden
·
468d
He said he’ll end inflation, but even the Wall Street Journal published an article agreeing:

Trump’s Project 2025 would cause even more inflation.

My economic plan is lowering costs and inflation.
Joe Biden
@JoeBiden
·
468d
He bragged about giving “the biggest tax cuts ever” to his billionaire buddies.

But the deal is that his Project 2025 agenda would raise taxes on the middle class.

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically labor rights and the protection of workers, and critiques a political figure's stance on these issues. The tone is confrontational and critical, aiming to highlight perceived deficiencies in the opponent's policies while promoting the speaker's own record.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses aggressive language and personal attacks, which can be harmful. (-2 points) [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the opponent and engages in a form of verbal attack, which can be seen as a form of harassment. (-2 points) [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on discrediting the opponent. (-2 points) [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. (-2 points) [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the speaker's influence to criticize an opponent, but it does not necessarily contribute to the betterment of society in a constructive manner. (-1 point) [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity due to its aggressive and confrontational nature. (-1 point) [-1]