Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement by Bill Maher involves a substantive engagement with a public issue, specifically addressing a security failure related to a shooting incident involving a former president. It questions the accountability of the current administration and the actions taken in response to the incident, which contributes to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but raises a critical issue about security and accountability, which is a legitimate public concern.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a focus on the issue rather than attacking individuals personally.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the actions of the administration. However, it could be seen as somewhat provocative, which might detract from a purely constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to raise a significant public issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.