Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement addresses a public issue related to the investigation of the DNC hack and the broader Russiagate controversy. It critiques the media's coverage and the FBI's reliance on CrowdStrike, suggesting a lack of independent investigation. The tone is critical and implies a conspiracy or oversight by major news outlets and the FBI.
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm with words and actions, but it does imply a significant oversight or conspiracy, which could indirectly harm public trust in institutions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques institutions rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on critique and raising awareness of perceived issues.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of institutions (media and FBI) but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It remains focused on the actions and decisions of these entities. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to raise concerns about public issues. It does so with a critical tone but does not appear to misuse the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.