EnricoMoses.eth
@EnricoMoses
·
524d
The statement 'Give me an example of “downplaying systemic racism.” If you’re going to argue a person perpetuates racism, use his actual words.' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive public issue—systemic racism—and calls for evidence-based discussion.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It asks for clarification and evidence, which is a neutral and constructive approach. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the need for evidence rather than making personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by asking for specific examples, which can lead to a more informed and empathetic discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue by asking for concrete examples rather than making personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by encouraging evidence-based discussion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.