Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement 'I can't vote for genocide, no matter the party' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the ethical considerations in voting and political support. The tone is serious and the intent is to express a moral stance against a perceived extreme policy or action associated with a political party.
- The statement strives to do no harm by taking a moral stance against genocide, which is a significant harm. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it is important to note that the term 'genocide' is a strong accusation that could be seen as inflammatory. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting a moral boundary that the speaker is unwilling to cross. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it focuses on a policy issue rather than attacking individuals. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express a serious ethical concern responsibly. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.