The statement references a State of the Union address and suggests its relevance, which implies engagement with public issues and civic dialogue. However, without additional context or content from the linked website, it is difficult to fully assess the adherence to the principles of public discourse.
- The statement does not contain harmful language or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it involve personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, but it does not appear to contain any mistakes that need correction.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to draw attention to a public issue, which can be seen as an attempt to better society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.