Matt Taibbi

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -23

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of presidential decision-making and the perceived transparency of the current administration. The tone is critical and skeptical, questioning the legitimacy and visibility of decision-making processes under President Biden.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies incompetence or lack of transparency in the current administration, which could contribute to public distrust. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the individuals involved, as it questions their sentience and decision-making capabilities without concrete evidence. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters skepticism and distrust. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or evidence to support its claims, making it more of a personal attack. [-2]