Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Prem Thakker
@prem_thakker
·
359d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the U.S. political stance on Israel and Palestine, and the actions of public figures like Kamala Harris and Joe Biden. The tone is assertive and calls for continued activism, reflecting a critical stance on the current political situation.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but calls for increased activist pressure, which can be seen as a form of political engagement rather than harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on political actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy towards pro-Palestine advocates by highlighting their perspective and concerns. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of political figures and policies without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for continued activism, which can be seen as an effort towards societal betterment from the perspective of the pro-Palestine advocates. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to discuss a significant public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.