The statement 'Death no, but capacity is a legitimate issue.' addresses a public concern about the capacity of a public figure, specifically President Biden, in response to a conversation about media consumption and misinformation. The tone is critical but not overtly hostile, and the intent appears to be to engage in a discussion about the President's capabilities.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does question the capacity of a public figure, which can be sensitive. It is a minor violation of this principle. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the dignity of the public figure to a reasonable extent. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is neutral in this regard.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a constructive critique of a public figure's capacity. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform responsibly, though it could be more constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.