ian bremmer
@ianbremmer
·
95d
The statement engages in a public discussion about the age of political figures, specifically Donald Trump, and its impact on his popularity. It questions whether age is the primary factor contributing to his unpopularity, which is a substantive engagement with a public issue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It raises a question about a public figure's age in the context of political viability, which is a common topic in political discourse. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning a commonly held belief and encouraging further discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by posing a question rather than making a personal attack or ad hominem argument. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a public debate without resorting to inflammatory language. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.