The statement is critical of the Secret Service head, Kimberly Cheatle, and calls for her resignation and further accountability within the agency. It addresses a significant public issue involving the safety of a former president and the performance of a federal agency, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement calls for accountability, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by ensuring competent leadership in critical positions. However, the tone is harsh and could be seen as contributing to a hostile environment.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does not show much respect for the dignity of the individual involved, as it calls for immediate resignation and firing without acknowledging any potential mitigating factors. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is focused on criticism and accountability without offering constructive solutions or acknowledging the complexity of the situation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not do so constructively. It does not provide specific suggestions for improvement or engage in dialogue with those who might disagree. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to call for accountability, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. However, the tone and approach could be more constructive. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.