Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement reports on a development involving the Justice Department, President Biden, and a biographer, which is a matter of public concern and thus constitutes public discourse. The tone is neutral and informative, aiming to update the public on a significant issue related to transparency and accountability in government.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions as it simply reports facts without inflammatory language. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing information that can help the public stay informed about government actions. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the facts of the situation. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct mistakes, but it does not appear to contain any errors that need correction.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses its influence to inform the public, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.