The statement primarily promotes a conversation and a book related to the crisis in Flint, Michigan, which is a public issue. However, it also includes a critical remark about Jill Stein and a comparison of Kamala Harris to Obama, which could be seen as engaging in public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions, as it promotes a conversation and a book addressing a public issue. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the phrase 'BLASTS Jill Stein's 'Arrogance'' could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting an important issue (Flint, Michigan), but the critical remark about Jill Stein could detract from this. (+1, -1)Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement includes a personal attack on Jill Stein by using the word 'arrogance,' which is not constructive criticism. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to bring attention to an important societal issue (Flint, Michigan), which is positive. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to discuss public issues, but the integrity could be questioned due to the personal attack. (+1, -1)Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.