Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse as it addresses political choices and critiques the support of certain political candidates, which are public issues. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, and it implies a moral judgment on those who support certain candidates.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses inflammatory language ('pro genocide options') which can be harmful and divisive. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others; it engages in a form of cyberbullying by harshly criticizing those who support certain candidates. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and dismissive. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses personal attacks and dismissive language rather than fostering a productive conversation. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use the platform responsibly; it uses inflammatory language and does not contribute to a respectful or constructive public discourse. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.