Reposted by Dr. Jill Steinđ»
The statement critiques Beyoncé's decision to license her music to Kamala Harris, contrasting it with her previous performance featuring Black Panther dancers. The tone is critical and suggests a perceived inconsistency in Beyoncé's actions regarding social and political issues.
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm but implies criticism of Beyoncé's actions, which could be seen as harmful to her reputation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more critical than constructive. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but does not offer constructive criticism or dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to critique a public figure's actions, which can be seen as contributing to public discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to express an opinion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.