Gunther Eagleman™
@GuntherEagleman
·
45d
The statement 'What is she to you?' in response to a tweet claiming that Kamala Harris is not Black does not constitute public discourse. It is a conversational and somewhat rhetorical question that does not substantively engage with public issues, policies, or societal concerns. The original tweet by @GuntherEagleman, however, does touch upon public discourse as it addresses the identity of a public figure, Kamala Harris, in a manner that could influence public perception and dialogue about race and identity.
- The original tweet by @GuntherEagleman could be seen as harmful as it questions the racial identity of Kamala Harris, which can perpetuate divisive narratives and harm public understanding. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The tweet does not respect the dignity of Kamala Harris by questioning her racial identity in a public forum, which can be seen as a form of harassment or hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The tweet does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it could contribute to misunderstanding and division. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The tweet does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a declarative statement without providing a basis for discussion or understanding. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the tweet falls under free speech, it does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity as it can spread misinformation and harm public discourse. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.