Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement is a critique of Kamala Harris, listing various policy positions attributed to her. The tone is critical and appears to be aimed at defining her political stance through these positions. The intent seems to be to influence public perception of Kamala Harris by highlighting these policies in a negative light.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to a polarized environment by presenting a one-sided view without context. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of the person being critiqued by presenting a potentially misleading summary of her positions. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism without fostering constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It lists policy positions in a way that could be seen as an attack rather than an invitation for discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or with integrity, as it lacks context and nuance. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.