Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement is a public call for the resignation and legal accountability of a political figure, which constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues and debates surrounding governance and justice.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly incite violence or harm, but the strong language could be seen as aggressive. It partially adheres to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use strong language that could be interpreted as confrontational. It partially respects the privacy and dignity of others.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a confrontational stance. It violates this principle. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and instead makes a direct demand for resignation and surrender. It violates this principle. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its confrontational tone. It partially upholds this principle. [-1]