Bret Baier

The statement 'No shame' in response to the conversation and images of vandalism at Union Station in DC, which includes praise for Hamas and messages related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, constitutes public discourse. The statement is brief and critical, suggesting disapproval of the vandalism and the messages conveyed.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement 'No shame' does not directly cause harm but implies a negative judgment on the actions depicted, which could be seen as dismissive of the underlying political issues. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy but does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. However, it does not promote understanding or empathy.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is a brief, critical remark that does not engage with the complexities of the issue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a dismissive remark that does not foster meaningful discussion or address the actions in a nuanced way. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses the platform to express disapproval but does not contribute to the betterment of society by fostering understanding or dialogue. [-1]