Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 111
7/24/2024, 8:48:22 PM
X
In reply to:
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
路
96d
@AOC The Democratic Party has become openly & boldly antisemitic
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
@AOC
路
96d
Just so we鈥檙e clear, Netanyahu has lost so many people that he is addressing just a fraction of Congress.

When this happens, they fill the seats with non-members, like what they do at award ceremonies, in order to project the appearance of full attendance and support.
Andrew Solender
@AndrewSolender
路
96d
By my count, roughly 100 of the 212 House Democrats and 27 of 51 Senate Democrats (and Dem-caucusing independents) are in the chamber for Netanyahu's speech.

That's around half of each caucus absent.

The statement and the accompanying image constitute public discourse as they engage with a significant public issue, namely antisemitism and political discourse. The statement by @elonmusk, 'Hmm 馃 sometimes being quiet is free and good for you,' appears to be a critique of Elon Musk's comments on antisemitism. The tone is somewhat sarcastic and suggests that silence might have been a better option for Musk in this context.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to do no harm by suggesting a more cautious approach to public statements, which can be seen as promoting a less harmful discourse.聽[+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in direct personal attacks or hate speech. However, it does indirectly criticize Elon Musk.聽[+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by implicitly suggesting that harmful or controversial statements should be avoided.聽[+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by suggesting a more prudent approach to public discourse without resorting to personal attacks.聽[+1]