Jeffrey Arial
@jarial25
·
343d
The statement critiques the fitness of a political figure, specifically the President, to hold office and make executive decisions. It engages in public discourse by addressing the capability and functionality of the executive branch, which is a substantive public issue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies incompetence, which could be seen as harmful to the individual's reputation. However, it is a critique of public performance rather than a personal attack. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the professional capacity of the individual in a public role.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques the professional capability and the functioning of the executive branch. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to raise concerns about public governance, which is a responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.