Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the fitness of a public official (the President) to hold office and the transparency of the executive branch. The tone is critical and accusatory, questioning the competence and decision-making process within the executive branch.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is accusatory and could be seen as harmful to the individuals it targets. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the President or his staff, implying incompetence and lack of transparency without evidence. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it leans towards personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to question the transparency and decision-making in the executive branch, which could be seen as an attempt to hold officials accountable. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, given the accusatory tone and lack of evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.