Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing Kamala Harris's record as California Attorney General, specifically her actions related to prison population and criminal justice reform. The tone is critical and aims to highlight perceived negative aspects of her tenure.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to critique Kamala Harris's record, which is a legitimate part of public discourse. However, it should ensure that the critique is based on accurate information to avoid causing harm through misinformation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy of Kamala Harris as a public figure, but it should avoid sensationalism and ensure that the critique is fair and balanced to maintain dignity.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is primarily critical and does not offer a balanced view or context for Harris's actions. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not appear to engage in constructive dialogue. It focuses on negative aspects without acknowledging any positive actions or providing a platform for rebuttal. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion about Kamala Harris's record. It should strive to do so responsibly by ensuring accuracy and fairness. [-1]