Nicole Shanahan
@NicoleShanahan
·
347d
The statement addresses public issues related to agricultural regulations, food safety, and government priorities, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of government agencies, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. However, it does not use harmful language.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It criticizes institutions rather than individuals, thus respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy for small farmers by highlighting perceived injustices. However, it could be more constructive in its approach. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of government agencies but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on policy issues rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a change in government priorities, which can be seen as an effort for societal betterment. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform to address public concerns responsibly, though it could benefit from more evidence-based arguments. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.