Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement criticizes the Vice President's message for not addressing what the commenter perceives as a more significant issue, namely the loss of 180,000 lives and the alleged involvement of the USA in funding genocide. The tone is accusatory and confrontational, aiming to highlight what the commenter sees as a moral failing in the Vice President's statement.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight a perceived moral failing, which can be seen as an attempt to do no harm by bringing attention to a serious issue. However, the accusatory tone may not fully align with this principle. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the Vice President, as it engages in a personal attack by accusing her of ignoring a significant issue. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on criticizing the Vice President's message without offering a constructive dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a confrontational tone and makes a serious accusation without providing a basis for constructive discussion. [-2]