+5
In reply to:
Cornel West
@CornelWest
·
84d
The statement 'I thank my sister Arwa Damon for this inspiring conversation!' and the subsequent references to conversations and interviews do not constitute public discourse. The primary content is promotional in nature, highlighting an interview and encouraging viewers to watch it. While the interview itself may engage in public discourse, the statement provided is more about promoting the interview rather than engaging in substantive public dialogue.
- The statement does no harm and is positive in nature. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting an inspiring conversation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in any form of criticism or dialogue, constructive or otherwise.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not involve any mistakes to acknowledge or correct.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to promote an interview that may contribute to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.