Washington Free Beacon
@FreeBeacon
·
117d
The statement critiques Vice President Kamala Harris and the Biden administration's handling of border policy, suggesting a failure in their approach. It references a conversation and an article that discuss Harris's role in immigration policy.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies failure, which could be seen as a critique rather than harmful speech. Minor adherence to the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on policy critique rather than personal attacks. Adheres to the principle. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical and does not offer constructive dialogue. Violates the principle. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive dialogue or avoid personal attacks. It implies failure without engaging in a meaningful discussion. Violates the principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does not use the platform responsibly to foster constructive dialogue. Minor violation of the principle. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.