Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to the cognitive health of President Biden and the involvement of Vice President Harris, which are matters of public concern and debate.
- The statement implies a cover-up and cognitive decline without providing evidence, which could be harmful if unsubstantiated. This could be seen as a violation of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement questions the integrity of public figures and could be seen as disrespectful if not backed by evidence. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does raise concerns about respecting the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather makes an accusatory claim. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments directly, but the tone is accusatory. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to raise a public issue, which aligns with the principle of free speech. However, the responsibility and integrity of the claim are questionable without evidence. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.