Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing a political issue involving a public figure and a political action committee. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting a transactional relationship between AIPAC and Vice President Kamala Harris. The statement implies that financial contributions influenced Harris's actions, which could be seen as undermining the integrity of her position. The image reinforces this by showing AIPAC's gratitude for Harris's condemnation of certain protestors.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by implying corruption or undue influence, which can damage reputations and trust in public institutions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved, as it makes a serious accusation without evidence. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it fosters division and suspicion. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a personal attack on Harris's integrity. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to cast doubt on the integrity of a public official, which could be seen as irresponsible. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.