Reposted by Christopher C. Cuomo
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue involving international conflict and violence. The tone is urgent and accusatory, focusing on a specific incident of violence and attributing it to a particular group.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. It uses charged language ('terrorists') which can inflame tensions and contribute to further conflict. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it labels a group as 'terrorists' without providing context or evidence, which can be seen as a form of hate speech. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It focuses on assigning blame rather than fostering dialogue or understanding. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a strong accusation without inviting discussion or considering other perspectives. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society. It could potentially escalate tensions and conflict rather than contributing to a peaceful resolution. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it makes serious accusations without sufficient context or evidence. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.