Gail Woods
@GailWoo63638514
·
213d
The statement 'Stop this jackassery. You must be against killing people you disagree with politically. Who in the news media is more transparent about openly stating we have to do better than Trump as president?' engages with public issues, specifically political discourse and media transparency. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, aiming to criticize both political violence and media bias.
- The statement's confrontational tone and use of the term 'jackassery' could be seen as harmful and disrespectful, violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the aggressive tone could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses a confrontational approach that may polarize rather than unite. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a confrontational tone and could be seen as a personal attack, particularly with the term 'jackassery.' [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity due to its confrontational and accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.