Reposted by Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley
The statement addresses the need for a code of ethics for the Supreme Court, highlighting specific reforms supported by progressives. It references a conversation involving a public figure and a news article, thus engaging in public discourse on judicial ethics and democracy reform.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on policy reforms, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, avoiding cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By advocating for ethical reforms and transparency, the statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the Supreme Court's lack of a code of ethics without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for societal betterment through judicial reforms. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss important public issues. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.