The statement criticizes the International Olympic Committee (IOC) for copyright-striking clips of the Olympics, arguing that this action contradicts the spirit of the Olympic Games and the IOC's charter. The tone is critical but aims to promote accessibility and inclusivity for the Olympic Games.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a policy issue rather than personal attacks, adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the importance of making the Olympic Games accessible to a wider audience, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the IOC's actions without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, adhering to the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By advocating for broader accessibility to the Olympic Games, the statement uses its influence for the betterment of society, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a public issue, aligning with the principle of responsible use of free speech. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.