The statement addresses a significant public issue related to the ethical standards of medical research and the role of regulatory bodies like the FDA and Congress. It critiques the perceived erosion of the Nuremberg Code's principles in the US, which is a substantive engagement with public policy and ethical standards in medical research.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It raises a critical issue without using harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by informing the public about the Nuremberg Code and its perceived erosion in the US. However, it could be more empathetic and compassionate by providing a balanced view. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the actions of institutions rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to highlight an important ethical issue, which can contribute to the betterment of society by fostering informed public discourse. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public concern. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.