Reposted by Ayanna Pressley
The statement addresses the need for a code of ethics for the Supreme Court, referencing various reforms supported by progressives and linking to further discussions and articles on the topic. The tone is assertive and calls for action, aiming to engage the public in a substantive issue related to judicial ethics and democracy reform.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on promoting ethical reforms, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, avoiding cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By advocating for ethical reforms and transparency, the statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion for a fair judicial system. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the current lack of a Supreme Court ethics code without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for societal betterment through judicial reforms. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to discuss important public issues. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.