Bret Baier

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 151

The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing a political issue involving Kamala Harris and her stance on fracking, as well as a response to an accusation by Donald Trump. The tone of the statement is accusatory and implies that Kamala Harris is being inconsistent or dishonest about her position on fracking.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it is accusatory and could contribute to a negative perception of Kamala Harris without providing full context. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of Kamala Harris, as it publicly accuses her of inconsistency without a detailed explanation or evidence. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is focused on pointing out a perceived inconsistency rather than fostering a constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a direct accusation without providing a platform for Kamala Harris to respond or explain her position. [-1]