The statement 'What is the rationale? Really?' is part of a conversation that addresses a public issue, specifically the practice of segregating Zoom calls by race and gender for Kamala Harris. This falls under public discourse as it engages with a societal issue and questions a policy or practice.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a question seeking clarification.
[+1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement seeks to promote understanding by asking for the rationale behind a practice. However, it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking a question rather than making a personal attack. However, the context provided by @onlinetrashbag's comment ('What an insufferable take') could be seen as a personal attack, but this is not part of the original statement being analyzed.
[+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by asking a question rather than making an unfounded accusation.
[+1]