Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the actions and policies of political figures and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It contrasts the actions of Kamala Harris and Jill Stein, and includes a call to action by promoting Jill Stein's speech and campaign.
- The statement does not directly incite harm but could be seen as polarizing by contrasting two political figures in a contentious issue. It does not explicitly violate the principle but could be more neutral in tone.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for privacy and dignity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy towards the Palestinian cause by highlighting Jill Stein's support for protestors. However, it could be seen as divisive by contrasting it with Kamala Harris's actions.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the actions of the political figures rather than their personal attributes.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to bring attention to a societal issue and promotes a political campaign that aligns with the author's views on justice and peace.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to responsibly promote a political message and campaign.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.