The statement addresses a public issue by discussing the controversy surrounding the opening ceremony of the Olympics and the public's reaction to it. It critiques the 'outrage machine' and clarifies a misunderstanding about the performance, which constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It aims to clarify a misunderstanding rather than inflame the situation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the issue rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying that the performance was not a portrayal of the last supper, which can help reduce unnecessary outrage. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the 'outrage machine' without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing a public issue and providing clarification. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.