Jill Stien

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 16

The statement addresses a public issue, specifically the response of law enforcement and political figures to student protests against a genocide. It critiques the actions of the police and the Biden-Harris administration, suggesting a failure to support the protesters and labeling them negatively.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('beat the living hell out of') which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, potentially inciting anger or violence. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions.Ā [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make broad accusations against political figures without specific evidence, which could be seen as disrespectful to their dignity.Ā [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses accusatory and divisive language, which could deepen societal divides rather than fostering constructive dialogue.Ā [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes sweeping generalizations and personal attacks against political figures, which constitutes ad hominem arguments.Ā [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to highlight an issue of public concern, which could be seen as an attempt to use influence for societal betterment. However, the accusatory tone undermines this potential positive impact.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, given its inflammatory and accusatory nature.Ā [-1]