Jill Stien

Rank 29 of 47
|
Score 22

The statement critiques the favorability ratings of Kamala Harris compared to Mike Pence, suggesting that media influence and financial backing play significant roles in shaping public perception. The tone is critical and somewhat cynical, implying manipulation by corporate-sponsored media.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm anyone with words or actions, but it does imply manipulation and bias, which could contribute to public distrust.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of media narratives.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a critical assertion without inviting discussion or providing evidence. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as undermining trust in media and political processes. [-1]