Matt Taibbi

The statement 'Five similarities between modern US and late Soviet Union' constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive comparison of political and social structures between two different eras and countries. The tone is critical and somewhat provocative, aiming to draw parallels that may be seen as controversial or debatable.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could be seen as harmful as it makes broad generalizations that may not be entirely accurate or fair, potentially fostering cynicism and distrust. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, particularly those in the media, intelligence, and military sectors, by making sweeping negative generalizations. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it seems to aim at highlighting negative aspects without offering constructive solutions or dialogue. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes broad, critical assertions without providing a platform for discussion or considering opposing viewpoints. [-2]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to draw attention to perceived societal issues, but it does so in a way that may not be responsible or constructive. [-1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does so in a manner that may lack integrity and responsibility, given the broad and potentially misleading comparisons. [-1]