Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a political issue, specifically the potential debate between Kamala Harris and Jill Stein. The tone is somewhat provocative, questioning Harris's willingness to debate and implying she might be afraid to do so.
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm but could be seen as provocative.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more confrontational. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism but borders on a personal attack by questioning Harris's courage. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to engage in political discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.