The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically political debates and the qualifications of political candidates. The tone is confrontational and challenges Kamala Harris to debate Jill Stein, implying that Harris is avoiding the debate out of fear. The intent is to mobilize support for Jill Stein by framing her as a courageous and principled candidate willing to debate important issues.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm, but the confrontational tone and implication that Kamala Harris is 'scared' could be seen as a form of verbal aggression.
 [-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement accuses Kamala Harris of hiding behind 'DNC bullies,' which could be interpreted as a form of harassment.
 [-2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses a confrontational approach.
 [-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a personal attack by implying Harris is scared and hiding.
 [-2]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses influence to promote a political candidate, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for a candidate with specific policies.
 [+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does so in a confrontational manner. It uses the platform to challenge a public figure, which is a responsible use of free speech but lacks integrity due to the tone.
 [+1]