Reposted by Bret Baier
David Plouffe
@davidplouffe
·
100d
The statement engages in public discourse as it addresses the issue of political debates and media bias, which are relevant public concerns. The tone is critical and somewhat confrontational, questioning the actions and motivations of a public figure in the context of media appearances and debate participation.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a confrontational tone that could be seen as provocative. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the courage of a public figure, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but borders on a personal attack by questioning the courage of the public figure. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to engage in public discourse, though the tone could be more constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.