Kamala HQ
@KamalaHQ
·
108d
The statement and associated images constitute public discourse as they engage in a political debate and challenge a public figure to a debate, which is a substantive engagement with public issues. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, aiming to provoke a response from Kamala Harris by questioning her willingness to engage in a debate.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses confrontational language and accuses Kamala Harris of being scared, which can be seen as a personal attack. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of Kamala Harris, as it publicly challenges her and questions her courage in a derogatory manner. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses a confrontational approach to provoke a response. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments by calling Kamala Harris scared. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to challenge a public figure, which can be seen as an attempt to engage in public discourse. However, the confrontational and accusatory tone undermines the integrity of the discourse. (-1 point)Â [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.