The statement engages in a discussion about the appropriateness of adding Joe Biden to Mount Rushmore, comparing him to other presidents like Ronald Reagan and Gerald Ford. This discussion touches on public perceptions of presidential legacies, which is a matter of public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a comparative opinion rather than an attack. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on expressing an opinion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by comparing presidential legacies. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a public debate about presidential legacies. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.